Denmark has got it wrong. Yes, the burka is oppressive and ridiculous – but that’s still no reason to ban it BORIS JOHNSON

Ah Denmark, what a country. If any society breathes the spirit of liberty, this is it.

Capture

It was only a few weeks ago that I was in Copenhagen for some international conference, and as ever I rose early and went for a run. As I passed through some yuppie zone of warehouse conversions and posh restaurants I saw to my amazement that the Danes had also got up early for exercise – and they were diving stark naked into the bracing waters of the harbour. And I thought to myself – that’s the Danes for you; that’s the spirit of Viking individualism. I mean, we have a climate warmer than Denmark; but even so, would you expect to see Brits disrobing and plunging into the waters of Canary Wharf, or even Greenwich? We are pretty easy-going, but not that easy-going.

Women wearing niqab and headscarves take part in a demonstration on August 1, 2018, the first day of the implementation of the Danish face veil ban, in Copenhagen, Denmark

If you wanted to visit a country that seemed on the face of it to embody the principles of JS Mill – that you should be able to do what you want provided you do no harm to others – I would advise you to head for wonderful, wonderful Copenhagen.

Denmark is the only country in Europe, as far as I know, that still devotes a large proportion of its capital city to an anarchist commune, called Christiania, where I remember spending a happy afternoon 25 years ago inhaling the sweet air of freedom. It is the Danes who still hold out against all sorts of EU tyrannies, large and small.

 

They still chew their lethal carcinogenic tobacco; they still eat their red-dyed frankfurters; they still use the krone rather than the euro; they still refuse to let foreigners buy holiday homes in Jutland; and of course it was the heroic population of Denmark that on that magnificent day in June 1992 stuck two fingers up to the elites of Europe and voted down the Maastricht treaty – and though that revolt was eventually crushed by the European establishment (as indeed, note, they will try to crush all such revolts), that great nej to Maastricht expressed something about the Danish spirit: a genial and happy cussedness and independence.

It is a spirit you see everywhere on the streets of Copenhagen in the veneration for that supreme embodiment of vehicular autonomy, the bicycle. The Danes don’t cycle with their heads down, grimly, in Lycra, swearing at people who get in their way. They wander and weave helmetless down the beautiful boulevards on clapped-out granny bikes, with a culture of cycling in which everyone is treated with courtesy and respect. Yes, if you wanted to visit a country that seemed on the face of it to embody the principles of JS Mill – that you should be able to do what you want provided you do no harm to others – I would advise you to head for wonderful, wonderful Copenhagen.

If you tell me that the burqa is oppressive, then I am with you. If you say that it is weird and bullying to expect women to cover their faces, then I totally agree.

 

So I was a bit surprised to see that on August 1 the Danes joined several other European countries – France, Germany, Austria, Belgium – in imposing a ban on the niqab and the burka – those items of Muslim head-gear that obscure the female face. Already a fine of 1000 kroner – about £120 – has been imposed on a 28-year-old woman seen wearing a niqab in a shopping centre in the north eastern town of Horsholm. A scuffle broke out as someone tried to rip it off her head. There have been demonstrations, on both sides of the argument. What has happened, you may ask, to the Danish spirit of live and let live?

If you tell me that the burka is oppressive, then I am with you. If you say that it is weird and bullying to expect women to cover their faces, then I totally agree – and I would add that I can find no scriptural authority for the practice in the Koran. I would go further and say that it is absolutely ridiculous that people should choose to go around looking like letter boxes; and I thoroughly dislike any attempt by any – invariably male – government to encourage such demonstrations of “modesty”, notably the extraordinary exhortations of President Ramzan Kadyrov of Chechnya, who has told the men of his country to splat their women with paintballs if they fail to cover their heads.

I am against a total ban because it is inevitably construed – rightly or wrongly – as being intended to make some point about Islam.

If a constituent came to my MP’s surgery with her face obscured, I should feel fully entitled – like Jack Straw – to ask her to remove it so that I could talk to her properly. If a female student turned up at school or at a university lecture looking like a bank robber then ditto: those in authority should be allowed to converse openly with those that they are being asked to instruct. As for individual businesses or branches of government – they should of course be able to enforce a dress code that enables their employees to interact with customers; and that means human beings must be able to see each other’s faces and read their expressions. It’s how we work.

 

All that seems to me to be sensible. But such restrictions are not quite the same as telling a free-born adult woman what she may or may not wear, in a public place, when she is simply minding her own business.

Advertisements

I was right to confront Jeremy Corbyn over Labour’s antisemitism

By watering down its definition of antisemitism, the Labour party has made itself a hostile environment for Jews

 Margaret Hodge is the Labour MP for Barking

The ‘Enough is enough’ demonstration outside parliament in March was a protest against Labour’s antisemitism.
 ‘The powerful ‘Enough is enough’ demonstration organised by the Board of Deputies and the Jewish Leadership Council in March has effectively been ignored.’ Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz / Barcroft Images

On Tuesday, I confronted Jeremy Corbyn in parliament and told him to his face what I and many others are feeling. Under his leadership the Labour party is perceived by most Jews, thousands of party members and millions of members of the public as an antisemitic, and therefore racist, party. As our leader, he is now perceived by many as an antisemite.

I am a secular, immigrant Jew. I have never been active in the Jewish community; my two marriages were to non-Jews. I have visited Israel a number of times and have been a vocal critic of successive Israeli governments on many counts. But I am a Jew. My grandmother and my uncle were murdered by Hitler and many cousins and other relatives were slaughtered in the gas chambers. Indeed, my grandfather was one of six siblings; we are the only surviving line left and that was because my parents were in Egypt when the war broke out.

I joined the Labour party to fight racism. In the 1960s the Labour party was the natural home for Jews. To find myself 50 years later, in 2018, confronting antisemitism in my own party is completely and utterly awful. It is especially awful because, in the 2010 general election, I took on and thrashed Nick Griffin and the BNP in Barking.

How have we got here? Under Jeremy’s leadership, the Palestinian/Israeli conflict has been allowed to infect the party’s approach to growing antisemitism. It appears to have become a legitimate price that the leadership is willing to pay for pursuing the longstanding cause of Palestinians in the Middle East. Because of that, antisemitism has become a real problem in the Labour party. In the last year my colleagues and I have been subjected to a growing number of antisemitic attacks on Facebook, Twitter and in the post.

Complaints to the Labour party about antisemitism from party members have been dealt with in a desultory manner. The powerful “Enough is enough” demonstration organised by the Board of Deputies and the Jewish Leadership Council in March has effectively been ignored.

And on Tuesday, Labour’s national executive committee agreed its own definition of antisemitism. Instead of adopting the international definition agreed in 2016 in the wake of the rise of antisemitism across Europe, the party chose to omit key examples used in that definition and rewrote the definition to weaken and change it.

The party thought it knew better than the Crown Prosecution Service, the government, the devolved administrations and local authorities; it thought it knew better than 31 other countries, including Austria, France and Hungary, all of which have adopted the internationally agreed definition in full.

nick griffin margaret hodge
Pinterest
 ‘Confronting antisemitism in my own party is especially awful because, in the 2010 general election, I took on and thrashed Nick Griffin and the BNP in Barking.’ Photograph: Kieran Doherty/Reuters

It thought it could ignore the united voices within the Jewish community, the opinion of the chief rabbi, a powerful plea from 68 rabbis and the strong views of Labour Members of Parliament.

To give just one example of what the changes do, a Labour party member who calls Zionists “Nazis” could face expulsion, but may find themselves merely warned. This means that in 2018 a party member can call a Jew a Nazi and might not face the severest punishment.

The arrogance displayed by the Labour leadership takes one’s breath away. A definition of sexual harassment agreed without the explicit endorsement of women would be unconscionable. A definition of Islamophobia that was rejected by the Muslim community would never be entertained. Yet a definition that rolls over the sensibilities of Jews who are the victims of this racism is somehow OK.

Add to that the outrageous political bungling in the handling of the issue and perhaps some of you may understand my anger. The Labour party is so distrusted by the Jewish community, we are the last people on Earth, at this time, who should think about amending a widely accepted definition of antisemitism – a definition that already recognises our right to criticise the government of Israel.

For the Labour party to have done this on the day when we were supposed to be united against the chaotic state of the government’s Brexit talks inevitably distracts attention – or maybe the Labour party was simply trying “to bury bad news”. There was a simple and straightforward alternative that Labour could have chosen. The party could have adopted the international definition in full and it could have launched an inclusive consultation, involving Palestinians and Jews to add to that definition if further clarification of the right to criticise the Israeli government was needed. Instead it chose to offend Jews. It chose to make the party a hostile environment for Jews. It chose to entrench antisemitism.

I chose to confront Jeremy directly and personally to express my anger and outrage. I stand by my action as well as my words.

 Margaret Hodge is the Labour MP for Barking

Daniel 9 and Basic Maths.

Daniel to the Nines – by Mordechai

Posted on June 28, 2018 by yourphariseefriend
~Daniel to the Nines~

Daniel 9 is one of the top two passages in the missionary arsenal. Although Isaiah 53 is their favorite go-to passage, there’s enough ambiguity that some Jews still do not seem to see Jesus in the text. With Daniel 9, though, we appear to have a clear date for his arrival and, possibly, his crucifixion.

Here’s how the King James Version (KJV) has the passage (verses 24-26), and although the KJV alters the text a little bit, it’s still a good source for our specific purpose today:

“[24] Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. [25] Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. [26] And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself…”

Dr. Michael Brown challenging Rabbi Mizrachi to...   ONE FOR ISRAEL MinistryIn my experience, Christians will present this verse to declare that the Messiah had to arrive before the destruction of the Second Temple and usually stop there. Presumably because there is math involved and because we need to establish timelines, it’s not a passage many wish (or are able) to discuss in depth. Therefore, we need to examine this as simply as possible to determine if Jesus fits the passage, assuming we accept the Christian assertion that this speaks of the Messiah.

It’s important to understand that many prominent Christian apologists (such as Dr. Michael Brown) understand that the seventy “weeks” terminate with the destruction of the Temple in 70CE, which is how normative, classical Judaism understands the timeline as well. With that as our common ground, let’s examine the passage again:

“…from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks”

Summarily, 483 years after a given starting point, the Messiah (literally, “anointed one”) will arrive.

“And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself…”

And after a period of 434 years will this person be killed.

Again, for this article we are not dealing with translations or punctuation. Often the Christian who presents this passage will have little familiarity with Hebrew to understand the difference. Our goal is to clarify the passage using their understanding.

If we use the KJV, we see that although the period discusses a 70 “week” period (490 years), there appears to be some ambiguity: where do the 62 “weeks” in verse 26 belong? Are they the same 62 “weeks” from verse 25 or are they a different set? If we were to say that they are different than the previously-mentioned 62 “weeks,” then we have two serious problems.

First, this interpretation would suggest that the Messiah (who arrives after 69 “weeks” and dies after another 62 “weeks”) should have lived 434 years before dying. Should the Christian insist that this speaks of Jesus, then either he was born well before Herod (from Matthew 2) or the census of Quirinius/Caesar Agustus (Luke 2), or that he died well after the destruction of the Second Temple.

The second complication is that if this is a legitimate reading of the text, then we have a period of time much longer than 490 years (7 weeks + 62 weeks + 62 weeks + 1 week = 924 years), and the angel clearly told Daniel that it would be only 490 years, ending with that horrible time in 70CE.

Another possible reading is from the NIV, which reads, (verse 26) “after the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death….” The use of the word “the” before “sixty-two” indicates that these sixty-two are the same as the previous sixty-two (which is actually consistent with the Hebrew text, by the way). We then have two more questions to consider regarding the Christian view.

One question is simple: If these are the same 62 weeks, why does verse 25 combine them with the seven weeks? Verse 26 doesn’t say “after the sixty-nine weeks,” or even “after the sixty-two weeks and seven weeks;” it only mentions the sixty-two. This suggests that there are in fact three distinct periods making up the full 70 weeks: seven weeks, sixty-two weeks, and one week.

The second question is a little more complex. As stated above, Jews and most Christians agree the 490 years ends in the year 70. However we look at the timeline (69 and the same 62 or 69 and a new 62), the anointed one is to be cut off immediately before the final week commences, meaning that this anointed one should have died about the year 63. However, no one will say that Jesus lived that long: conservative estimates have Jesus dying before the year 35.

Thus, according to Christian readings of the text, we have a serious conundrum. Christians would have to argue that either A) Jesus was born 400 years before the gospels say he was, B) Jesus lived more than 400 years and was still alive when the Temple was destroyed, or C) that Jesus died in the year 63CE.

However we look at it, Jesus could not have been the subject of Daniel 9.

-Mordechai

Letter to a messianic about a Messiah

Letter to SY about Messiah

Posted on December 21, 2010 by 

The following essay was sent to a Messianic leader. He suggested that we exchange our respective views about the Messiah that was predicted by the prophets of the Jewish Scriptures. I sent him my point of view, but I never received any response from him. I do find it interesting that most of my correspondence with Messianics and Christians adhere to the same template. I write something based on Scripture, and the response I get is generally the same: silence. I wonder why?

pig

As we agreed – here is my presentation of the Messiah from the perspective of the Jewish Scriptures.

Genesis 49:10 tells us that the Messiah will have the nations gather to him.

Numbers 24:17-19 tells us that the Messiah will achieve military victory over Israel’s enemies.

Isaiah 11:1-12:6 Describes a leader imbued with a spirit of God, wisdom, understanding, council, strength, knowledge and fear of God. He will be a righteous judge and he will smite the wicked dead. Here too, it speaks of the nations seeking him (11:10 – as in Genesis 49:10).

In this passage we get a description of the times of the Messiah. The prophet speaks of universal peace and universal knowledge of God (11:6-9). The prophet speaks of the ingathering of Israel’s exiles (11:11 -16) and Israel’s victory over her enemies (11:14 – as in Numbers 24:17-19).

The prophet then describes Israel’s song and exultation in praise of God (12:1-6).

Isaiah 55:3,4 speaks of God’s kindness towards David and how He has appointed Him a leader and a commander for the nations. My understanding of this passage is that it refers to David’s descendant; the Messiah. God’s promises to David are fulfilled through this descendant of his. This fits in with the other prophecies that refer to the Messiah (Genesis 49:10, Isaiah 11:10).

Jeremiah 3:15 speaks of shepherds after God’s heart implying that the Messiah will not rule alone but that there will be a plurality of leaders in that time. This concept is repeated in Obadiah 1:21and Micah 5:4.

Jeremiah 23:5-8 and 33:14-16 describe Messiah as a king who executes justice and charity and that there will be security for Israel in his days.

Jeremiah 30:9 refers to the Messiah as “David” – as does Ezekiel (34:23,24, 37:24) and Hosea (3:5). I want to talk about this point at length after I finish listing the Scriptural references.

Jeremiah 30:21 tells us that the Messiah will be one of us (the Jewish people at the end of time will consider him one of their own) and that God will have to bring the Messiah close to Himself – because who would dare approach God.

Ezekiel 34:23-31 speaks of the Messiah as a shepherd and a prince. The prophet describes the times as a period of peace, security and great bounty.

Ezekiel 37:22-28 also speaks of the Messiah and his times. It speaks of the Temple being rebuilt, Israel’s reconciliation with God, ingathering of the exiles, observance of the Law, and a covenant of peace.

Ezekiel 44:3 speaks of the privilege of the prince/Messiah to eat his offerings in a special area of the Temple (reminiscent of Jeremiah 30:21).

Ezekiel 45:7,8 speaks of the land that will be designated for the Messiah in the end-times.

Ezekiel 45:16,17 speaks of the messiah’s responsibility to pay for the communal offerings of the holidays.

Ezekiel 45:22 speaks of the Messiah’s responsibility to bring a sin-offering for himself and for the nation.

Throughout chapter 46 (Ezekiel) we learn of various privileges and responsibilities of the Messiah (verses 2,4,8,10,12,15-18).

Micah 5:3 speaks of the Messiah shepherding Israel with the might of God, Israel will return from the exile, and the fame of the Messiah will reach the ends of the earth. (Note that Micah 5:1 tells us that the Messiah will be from the Bethlhemite clan – in keeping with the promise to David).

According to many commentators, Zechariah 9:9,10 also refer to the Messiah. Here he is described as righteous and poor – riding on a donkey. He will rule with peace over the ends of the earth.

Zechariah chapters 12 and 13 refer to the house of David in a position of leadership in the end-times – also a Messianic reference (12:7,8,10,12, 13;1). Here too, we have a description of a military victory of Israel over her enemies.

I think that these are the Scriptural references of the man Messiah that are most explicit and clear. The picture we gather is that the Messiah will be a wise and righteous king of the Davidic dynasty who will rule over Israel in an era when all the nations recognize Israel’s role as God’s firstborn son. Thus all of the nations will be subject to the Messiah as part of their submission to Israel (Isaiah 60:12).

It is clear that the times of the Messiah are those glorious end-times that are so vividly described by the prophets (Deuteronomy 4:30, 30:1-10, 32:43, Jeremiah 3:14-18, 16:14,15,19, 23:3-6, 30:3,7-11,16-25, 31:1-39, 32:37-44, 33:6-26, 46:27,28, 50:4,5,19,20, Ezekiel 11:17-20, 20:40-44, 28:25-26, 34:9-16,22-31, 36:6-15,22-38, 37:1-28, 38:1-48:35, Isaiah 1:26,27, 2:2-4, 4:2-6, 10:33-12:6, 24:21-25:9, 30:26, 34:1-35, 40:1-11, 41:10-20, 43:5-10, 44:1-5 49:8-26, 51:11,22-52:12, 54:1-55:5, 56:7, 60:1-63:9, 65:17-25, 66:10-24, Hosea 2:1-3,16-25, Joel 3;1-5, 4:1-21, Amos 9:11-15, Obadiah 1:17-21, Micah 4:1-7, 5:1-13, 7:8-20, Zephaniah 3:9-20, Zechariah 2:9, 8:2-8, 14:3-21, Malachi 3:4,16-24, Psalm 51:20,21, 69:36,37, 98:1-3, 102:14-23, 126:1-6, Daniel 2:44, 7:18,22,27, 12:2,3,)

The fact that the prophets refer to the Messiah by the name; David, tells us that the Messiah will be like David. Of all of the characters in the Jewish Scripture, we know David best. His entire heart is open for all to read in the Book of Psalms. David loved God with all of his heart and his words reflect that love. David was totally self-effacing before God. He publicly recognized and acknowledged his failings and sins before God. The utter humility of David before God, and David’s all-consuming love of God touched the heart of Israel and continues to touch Israel’s heart to this very day. The prophet describes David as the one who gives pleasantness to Israel’s song (2Samuel 23:1). David is the ultimate human king. David was the man who had the ability to lead his people to spiritual victory as well as military victory without diverting the attention of the people to himself. David directed everyone’s devotion to God and to God alone. With David as our king the sovereignty of God is in no way eclipsed. This is what we look forward to. We look forward to a time when everyone is absolutely cognizant of God’s absolute sovereignty – under a king who continuously inspires us to increase and grow in our awareness of God’s absolute sovereignty and love

I think this sums up my understanding of the Messiah – I am looking forward to hearing your perspective.

If you found this article helpful please consider making a donation to Judaism Resources by clicking on the link below.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FEAQ55Y7MR3E6

Judaism Resources is a recognized 501(c) 3 public charity and your donation is tax exempt.

Thank You

Yisroel C. Blumenthal

Rabbi Ignoramus

The Endorsement of Itzhak Shapira – a Video, an Appeal and a Challenge

The Endorsement of Itzhak Shapira – a Video, an Appeal and a Challenge

Itzhak Shapira holds “full ordination” from the IAMCS and his book; “The Return of the Kosher Pig” comes with ringing accolades from some of the top names in Messianic and Evangelical circles. With these endorsements in his back pocket, Shapira disseminates his teachings in person and online to innocent and well-meaning people all over the world. These people cannot on their own evaluate Shapira’s expertise because they do not know the language of the texts that serve as the basis of his teachings. Instead, they rely on the appraisal of those who have granted him ordination and who claim to see him as a serious scholar.

Recently, Shapira released a video of one of his teachings. In this video, Shapira does not limit himself to the teaching itself. He tries his hand at reading a few lines of the Talmud. The Talmud is the foundational book of rabbinic literature and Shapira is described by these Christian leaders as a scholar in the field of rabbinic literature. But Shapira is nothing of the sort.

I showed this clip to a few elementary school children, ages 12-14. These youngsters are beginners in the study of Talmud. These children were convinced that this was some type of comic skit. Shapira’s inability to make his way through a few simple lines of Talmud was so embarrassingly obvious to these beginners that they could not imagine someone posting such a video unless he was trying to make a joke.

I now turn to those leaders who have put their names behind Itzhak Shapira and I appeal to you. Please check out this video. Absorb the incredible ineptitude displayed in this video and ask yourselves if this man can lay any legitimate claim to expertise in the realm of rabbinic literature. On what basis do you allow this impostor to mislead innocent people? How can you aid and abet Shapira’s ongoing deception?

I challenge you to live up to your calling as human beings created in the image of God and publicly withdraw your endorsements from Itzhak Shapira. I hope and pray that you do so with tact and with sensitivity, but also effectively and decisively. Those who have put their trust in your leadership deserve no less.

Shapira

eli

Unfortunately this “rabbi” cannot proficiently read through a line of Talmud . This video is riddled with blatant mistakes and misinformation.

For the sake of education and exposing it for the sham it is:

First off he starts with a mistake about the page: he tells his audience that the Hebrew letter פ has the numerical value of 70. In truth though, it is actually 80. He then tells his viewers that a page of Talmud has too sides (i.e. side a and side b) he refers to these sides as ‘Daf Alef’ and ‘Daf Bet’. In truth, there is no Daf Alef in the Talmud. In the Talmud side a is referred to as Amud Alef and side b is referred to as Amud Bet.

We then hear him inform his viewers about the context leading up to the line he wants to read, he misleads his viewers to believe that the discussion of the lines of Talmud he fumbled through are speaking of a ‘Tikun’ and of a ‘Pidyon’. The truth is that the words that he read have nothing to do with a ‘Tikun’ or a ‘Pidyon’.

He then asserts that the part that he wants everyone to pay close attention to is a continuation from the lines above. (i.e. part of the topic of discussion being addressed just prior to it.) This too is erroneous.

His attempt to read and translate both the Talmud itself and the words of Rashi would make entry students of the Talmud laugh and cry.

For the purpose of the exercise please click on this link which has both the Aramaic and the translation with elucidation of that page of Talmud. He is referencing the last section of page 80 a.

https://www.sefaria.org/Bava_Kamma.80a.9…

Rav and Shmuel and Rav Assi once met at a Bei Shavua HaBen (lit. house of the week of the son) (circumcision of a boy) or as some say, at a Bei Yeshua HaBen (lit. house of the redemption/salvation of the son) (a party for the redemption of a son). [The story continues] Rav would not enter before Shmuel, nor Shmuel before Rav Assi, nor would Rav Assi enter before Rav. They therefore argued who should go in last, [and it was decided that] Shmuel should go in last, and that Rav and Rav Assi should go in [together].

What Tzahi then asserts here is that the words Bei Yeshua HaBen somehow refers to a “son” who’s name is Yeshua which he asserts is a reference to Jesus of Nazareth.

This is a display of ignorance at its finest.

Based on this inane assertion, Tzahi claims that this line in the Talmud “proves without a shadow of a doubt” that the author of at least parts of the Talmud was a believer in Yeshua.

What upsets me is that Christian/ Messianic scholars allow him to get away with it. His viewers are clearly unable to know whether he knows what he’s talking about or not and he is taking advantage of their inability to challenge him.

More on the scholarly output of Shapira here.

 

WAR AT SUKKOT! (Part 1 – Introduction)

Article by Palm Tree of Devorah

12 Tishrei 5778

In a way it has already started and in a way it has been going on already for a very long time. But, we Jews tend to forget. That’s why “remembering” is a mitzvah.

Image result for tommy waller and rabbi melamed
Tommy Waller (right) with Rabbi Eliezer Melamed. 

Call it a “love” invasion, but it is an invasion nonetheless. Hordes of invaders flooding across the borders of Eretz Yisrael seeking to murder Jewish souls with hugs and kisses (and $$$). The invaders themselves find this idea laughable, as do many who identify themselves as Jews, but let me assure you, in the eyes of our Creator, it is no laughing matter.

…If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, “Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known.”

Of the gods of the peoples around you, whether near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth; you shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him.

But you shall surely kill him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.

And you shall stone him with stones so that he dies, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. (Devarim 13:7-11)

If this is how we are commanded to respond to those who are dearest to our hearts and fellow Jews, how much more so to those foreigners among the nations! And if this is how we are commanded to respond to one who simply entices us to go stray, how much more so one who actually accomplishes it!

Tommy Waller’s Hayovel Ministry is the tip of the spear in this war because it has managed to do what no other Christian ministry has done. They have infiltratedYehudah and Shomron; practically establishing Christian yishuvim right next to the Jews and have the backing of prominent so-called “Orthodox” rabbis.

Image result for tommy waller and rabbis

In the beginning, we were told that Tommy Waller, his family and his volunteers were Bnei Noach, that they had left Christianity. When we proved they were still Christians, their vociferous Jewish supporters said, “Yes, they are Christians, but they don’t proselytize.” Then, when we brought proof that they were indeed proselytizing, they came back with, “Well, what do you expect, they are just doing what Christians do, but not one Jew has been led astray by them.”

The Torah does not tell us to wait until the Jewish soul is caught in the trap before acting to prevent it. Enticement itself is a criminal act.

This is so much more than just Christians being Christians and wanting Jews to be “saved” by faith in their man-god Yeshu. This is a tactic of Gog uMagog and it always has been. It has always been the Satan’s best plan for assimilating Jews out of existence. He has been working on it and perfecting it over time and if the degree of support they command within the Jewish community is any indication, Hayovel is succeeding beyond imagining.

Gentiles and Jews coming together to form “one new man” has been the stated goal of Christianity since its beginnings. Whereas before the founding of modern Israel, Jews were pressured to cross over to the Christian side and give up their Jewish identity, today, the Christians are crossing over to the Jewish side claiming to be restoring the “Jewish roots” of their faith. Gentile believers in Yeshu are now calling themselves “Messianic Ephraimites” and Jewish believers in Yeshu are called “Messianic Jews.” Together, they are proclaimed to be “one new man” in relationship with the Christian man-god-messiah.

But, this is the same “one new man” the Apostle Paul lauded…

“For [Yeshu] is our peace,…who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility, by setting aside in his flesh the law with its commands and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new humanity out of the two,….” i.e.Jews and Gentiles. (Source: The False Testament)

This is the goal of all attempts to proselytize Jews. Were this ever to be accomplished, it would be the end of Am Yisrael and the end of Judaism. So, yes,this is a war – a war for the hearts and minds of Jews and Hayovel is the tip of the sword at our necks.

The claim that Tommy Waller personally has never proselytized Jews might be true. But, there is ample proof that while he keeps his hands clean in order to make this claim true, others are doing his dirty work for him. (This tactic has worked for many other Christian ministries in Israel as their leadership stays apart from the actual proselytizing, knowing all the while that those under their leadership are doing it for them.) It apparently never occurs to them that they would not have to revert to such subterfuge if their religion were true.

Deception, Thy Name Is Tommy Waller

“I am not a Jew with trembling knees”.- Menachem Begin

Posted by Donny Fuchs at 11:44 AM

In Tomer Devora’s recent blog post, “There’s Nothing New Under the Sun”, the author explains how Tommy Waller’s latest public apology tour is merely another evangelical tactic straight out of “The Book of Spiritual Warfare According to Paul”. Without belaboring the point, it cuts through the veneer of Waller’s apology by explaining his clever use of verbal gymnastics to delude those who already see Waller as a kosher Santa Claus. Those who are ignorant of evangelical doctrine and tactics are vulnerable to the two-faced Waller. And too many naive Jew are impressed by the crocodile tears of evangelicals.

image

Missionary activity outside Tel Aviv Savidor terminus 28 Sep 2018, Yovel may not be Hayovel but it’s the same shit different pile non the less.

Waller is as deadly as any crocodile. But he is also crafty. Like all successful evangelicals, Waller mastered the doctrine of wearing a hundred different masks to fool a hundred people. One mask for prostitutes. Another one for robbers. One for the poor. Another for the greedy. And an assortment of masks to trick Jews with kipot. There are even masks to fool Rabbis, Hashem help us! The perverse spectacle of Waller’s apology tour, is a direct result of the effect some of us are having on exposing this issue. Simply put, Waller and his Jewish enablers are terrified of recent revelations (see video below) which expose Hayovel’s true agenda.

On the one hand there are the shrill Jews who libel and slander us and accuse us of the same. The ones who refuse to respond to evidence, and have the nerve to accuse of us wrong-doing. They are biting back like wounded predators, with their incessant false allegations of “ruining good names and denigrating Torah scholars”. All of it is untrue.

On the other hand, you have the evangelicals themselves, taking the soft “Brother Esau” approach. Taking the punches in stride, to show humility and understanding. For the intellectually inclined, the facts speak for themselves. But Hayovel’s Jewish supporters are not intellectually honest. And they are emotionally invested in friendships with these people. If they were intellectual about this issue, this would be a non-issue. Our claim is stronger. We have the data to back up our position.

Shame on any Jew whose emotional spine is so bent over, that he actually falls for Waller’s cleverly orchestrated apologetics. Considering the evidence, it is astounding that ANY Jew would have anything to do with these Hayovel swine. Consider the following video from February 2017, when Tommy Waller let down his hair among his “believing” friends. Naturally, Tommy Waller is having to respond to these videos so he is working over-time to give it “context”. On his own Facebook page, they keep removing these videos each time they are posted in the comments section. Why is that? Because these videos expose Waller as a charlatan who will never renege on his evangelical mandate, but will readily change tactics to achieve his results.

Two final points: If certain Jewish “leaders” don’t want us posting pictures of them taking photos with missionaries, they should heed my advice:

Don’t take pictures with missionaries!

And if they were naive and unaware in the past, then they have an obligation to:

1. publicly declare it to be so
2. be humble and educate themselves
3. disengage from any and all similar associations in the future.
But if you take a public photo-op with missionary Mike Isley and you are in the public eye, then you can expect that we will share it with the Jewish masses, because YOUR irresponsible behavior endangers Jews. A Jew who cares for his fellow Jews has no other choice. (For more on Mike Isley: http://jewishisrael.ning.com/page/jewish-sermon-on-the-mount)

To our frightened Jewish and non-Jewish detractors: Your impotent threats and petulance don’t matter to those of us who are committed to this spiritual battle. We will not be cowed by bullying tactics. Our only concern is that the Torah truth prevails. It is NEVER personal or premised on hatred of Jews or decent gentiles. It is always about the halacha, and the inherent dangers of such toxic relationships.

There is One True Judge. One day, all of those tragic Jews who joined hands with Hayovel will have to answer to Hakadosh Baruch Hu for their outrageous actions. The day of Teshuva is upon us. May Hashem forgive those who engage in authentic repentance, and plant wisdom in the minds of those who are in dire need of it. And may The Almighty strike down the destroyers of Judaism, whether they wield the sword, or wield a hoe with the false smile of a distant brother with ill intentions.

#WhenThereAreNoMen
#ThisWontGoAwayByIgnoringIt
#FeiglinsFolly
#DoesZehutSupportHayovel
#RumblingsWithinZehut
#TheWallsHaveEars
Posted by Donny Fuchs at 11:44 AM
Email This
BlogThis!
Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook
Share to Pinterest